All Members


With Easter only days away, Qantas and Virgin Group employees received a generic communication from their respective HR departments which gave some direction with regard to employee rights regarding Public Holidays. The ALAEA suggests these communications were misleading when considered in light of this week’s Full Federal Court Decision regarding Public Holidays CFMMEU v OS MCAP Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 51 CFMMEU Decision.


The ALAEA has written to employers Wednesday afternoon detailing the statements that we believe are misleading and requested employers amend their respective notices to more accurately reflect the CFMMEU Decision.


It is important to note that this decision is NOT a licence to simply not turn up to work on public holidays.


The decision concerns the employers ‘request’ to work a public holiday and the employees right to refuse to work a public holiday on ‘reasonable’ grounds.


We expect this decision will be appealed by employers and members should be aware that a challenge to their employer’s approach will be defended very aggressively and will likely end up in a court room.


The Court effectively stated the following:


  1. Every employee has the right to have a day off on a public holiday and be paid for the this time off.
  2. However, employers can request employees to work public holidays if the request is reasonable;
  3. Nevertheless, employees can reasonably refuse an employer’s request.

There are two areas of concern in the PH Notices;


1 – Both groups have suggested that a roster is a request for you to work a public holiday.

It is the position of the ALAEA that this does not meet the threshold required by the CFMMEU Decision (with my emphasis in bold):


“… An employer is able to have a roster which includes public holidays. All that is required is that an employer ensures that employees understand either that the roster is in draft requesting those employees who have been allocated to the holiday work that they indicate whether they accept or refuse that allocation, or where a request is made before the roster is finalised…”


2 – The statement that employees (with my emphasis in bold):


May refuse to work on a public holiday, but you must have a really good reason as to why, for example extenuating personal circumstances, or exceptional circumstances.


The ALAEA believes these statements are factually incorrect and misleading and at odds with the CFMMEU Decision, which says that an employee’s refusal to work a public holiday must be reasonable. For clarity, to refuse to work a public holiday you do need to have a reason.


For example, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Fair Work Bill 2008 at [454] provides the following in relation to public holidays:


“… a refusal by an employee of a request to work on a public holiday maybe reasonable where, e.g., the employee has notified the employer in advance that she or he will not be able to work on the public holiday because of family commitments.”


Any members who require more information please contact the ALAEA office or myself.


In Unity

Peter Gill

Acting Federal Secretary

Australian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA)


Notice_002_2023_Public Holiday Decision